Alex talks with “Chris,” the man who carried an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle to an Obama event in Phoenix, Arizona, on Monday. Arizona has an open carry law. The corporate media has spent the last several days attempting to demonize the man and the Second Amendment. www.infowars.com
#1 by ExoSavage on March 8, 2010 - 12:43 pm
Quote
on CNN they tried to do make it sound racist haha they didnt show his color and started putting words into peoples mouths
#2 by ExoSavage on March 8, 2010 - 1:11 pm
Quote
this ausie knows what hes talking about, too bad u guys have to pay i herd upwards of $200 for a 30 rd mag dang that must suck
#3 by karlkarlkarl1234 on March 8, 2010 - 1:59 pm
Quote
I’m from Australia, you yanks need to do everything to keep your guns, because your Government means you harm, and wants to put you in the socialist North American Union and then the New World Government. Your gun rights are there to stop the government from trying to take American sovereignty and your rights.
#4 by PwnzingFilms on March 8, 2010 - 2:11 pm
Quote
GUN RIGHTS GUN RIGHTS GUN RIGHTS!
#5 by JimTL1000R on March 8, 2010 - 3:09 pm
Quote
What drives me nuts is 90% of guns today are used for sport. Hunting or shooting paper. What totally pisses me off is…With all the public shootings in the past 12 years has anyone shot back? NO! I think the gun laws have done there job. This proves the bad guy shoots ya and the good guy dosen’t…AND THE GOOD GUY IS ALLOWED TO CARRY AND SHOOT BACK IN DEFENCE!?!?!?!? WTF?
#6 by labcoat31 on March 8, 2010 - 3:54 pm
Quote
When they did that they just proved there not real news!!!
#7 by rommelAOE on March 8, 2010 - 4:03 pm
Quote
maybe?
#8 by johnandersonii on March 8, 2010 - 4:20 pm
Quote
Furthermore, Arizona police rock! Popularly elected Sheriff’s, who aren’t afraid to enforce to the laws of our state OVER the laws of the federal system. Arizona police know a man with a gun is protected and sacred, if he does something wrong, the police and the citizenry will react. But a man carrying a gun is normal.
#9 by johnandersonii on March 8, 2010 - 4:43 pm
Quote
Olberman is an idiot. This is Arizona. For that one gun that was seen on T.V. one out of every 80 people on that scene had a gun, legally, concealed carried. Arizonans own and carry guns. So do people in at least 35 of the 50 states. The media is based in areas where gun carrying is taboo. Maybe they have a bias?
#10 by Weintraubeheld221 on March 8, 2010 - 4:55 pm
Quote
this new Intro is sooooo… Porn
#11 by XXXwolf134XXX on March 8, 2010 - 5:05 pm
Quote
ooh, ooh, ooh, I have an idea. Columbine was an inside jobby job.
#12 by Decapoe on March 8, 2010 - 5:29 pm
Quote
Morons.
#13 by gregorioc1 on March 8, 2010 - 6:05 pm
Quote
And the scam journalism at MSNBC zoomed in so that you couldn’t see the color of his skin, all while calling him a racist white guy there to kill the President. What a joke our media is. All owned by the Rockefellers. We’ve been asleep for far too long. ChangeDaChannel!!!!
#14 by vpzm on March 8, 2010 - 6:44 pm
Quote
Is Utube censoring?
#15 by joe80dman on March 8, 2010 - 6:46 pm
Quote
@cbreitel: Federal statutes CAN NOT supersede the US Constitution. The government depends very much upon an uneducated public to accomplish this. In fact, many government employees are unaware of the Constitution, and how it limits, or in some cases, nullifies their authority altogether.
#16 by christianvanbowen on March 8, 2010 - 7:44 pm
Quote
If The government wanted your guns they would pass a health care bill for every one to participate in. With the growing ID theft in america they would eventually place a R-fid chip in every one to keep up with you. Evolve the banking system in it
And once you become dependent on that well there goes your Guns. all of them. If you speak out they’ll just cut off your chip. You cant buy sell or trade without the mark of the beast . Revelations
#17 by cbreitel on March 8, 2010 - 8:02 pm
Quote
It says so in our federal statutes. If you don’t believe me, try taking your gun into the federal courthouse or other federal buildings in your city and see what happens.
#18 by ThePhantomKing on March 8, 2010 - 8:36 pm
Quote
And that is also true, and its near to what I said
#19 by joe80dman on March 8, 2010 - 9:01 pm
Quote
@cbreitel: The 2nd Amendment IS at play here, without a doubt. Governments at all levels have been working endlessly to dilute the true meaning, and the significance of the 2nd Amendment for many years now. “The Right of the People to KEEP, and BEAR ARMS shall NOT be infringed.”, says it all.
#20 by joe80dman on March 8, 2010 - 9:42 pm
Quote
@ThePhantomKing: Women are more easily persuaded than men. This is why women weren’t allowed to vote until 1920. They vote with their emotions, and not their good, common sense.
#21 by joe80dman on March 8, 2010 - 10:31 pm
Quote
@cbreitel: WHERE in the text of the 2nd Amendment does it state that private firearms are NOT ALLOWED on Federal Property? If WE the PEOPLE are the owners of our government, as the media contends, then why CAN’T the People bear arms on Federal (citizen owned) property? They depend upon the People’s lack of knowledge of the Constitution to trick them into believing otherwise.
#22 by joe80dman on March 8, 2010 - 11:19 pm
Quote
The People don’t know their Rights because the government (public) schools have deliberately never taught them their Rights. They much prefer to allow Hollywood to depict gun ownership as something ILLEGAL. NOW THE CONSTITUTION, PEOPLE. They depend upon your ignorance of the Law to enslave you.
#23 by ThePhantomKing on March 8, 2010 - 11:50 pm
Quote
Chris AKA Malcom X, FYI
#24 by vincentdwp on March 9, 2010 - 12:15 am
Quote
i still dont get your point if it were staged or not whats yourpoint that you cant carry i fire arm unless you let all the cops know your plans?
#25 by cbreitel on March 9, 2010 - 12:32 am
Quote
If you think it’s pointless, why did you chime in at all? So far one person tried to disagree with me on my views on the 2nd amendment, when I haven’t expressed my views on the 2nd amendment, and now you’re here arguing with me about it being a publicity stunt when you’ve just admitted that you agree it was a publicity stunt. Interesting.